October 17, 2013

Story Problems for Grownups

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel

Back in grade school, you did all sorts of math problems. You started out with drills to learn your basic addition, subtraction, and multiplication. You learned long division (ugh). You moved on to fractions. And all along the way, as part of your teachers' efforts to convince you that it all matters here in the "real world," you did "story problems." Remember those?

Well, now you're all grown up, so here's a grownup story problem to ponder:

You're an IRS auditor, toiling away to protect the government's revenue base. Then you decide to leave "the dark side" and start your own practice. Things start off great, but you want more. So you mock up some fake tax returns, tell some clients they owe $11 million, and have them make payments into a bogus "trust account." Then you take the money for yourself, make some home improvements, buy a beach house in Mexico, pay to use a private plane, pay $2 million on your personal credit cards and loans, and make some investments. It's good to be rich, isn't it? But now there's a teensy-weensy little problem. The IRS is on to you, your clients are hopping mad, and two of them are scheduled to testify against you! What do you do?

Well, if you're Steven Martinez of Ramona, California, you send your limousine driver (!) to offer a hit man $100,000 to take out the clients. But you don't just whisper some names in his ear and slink back home. Oh, no. Because you're an accountant, you're thorough. Right? So you surveil the victims and watch them to document their habits. You give the hit man packets with photos of the victims and their homes and detailed instructions and information about them. (How else do you think an accountant would go about whacking his clients?)

Unfortunately, Martinez should have followed his hit man, too. Then Martinez would have seen him scurrying straight to the FBI. (Oops.) It's tough to deny the charges when the Feds have you on video, "cool and calculating," telling your killer to buy two guns — and a silencer! (Try explaining that when it hits Youtube and goes viral!)

Last year, Martinez pled guilty to charges including murder-for-hire, witness tampering involving attempted murder, solicitation of a crime of violence, mail fraud, filing false returns, Social Security fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering. (You've got to wonder, if he had jaywalked to meet with the hit man, would they have charged him with that, too?) On April 12, 2013, District Court Judge William Q. Hayes pretty much threw the book at him, sentencing him to 286 months in prison (plus five years supervised release if he ever makes it out) and ordering him to pay more than $14 million in restitution. Let's see what sort of "home improvements" Martinez can make with the 11 cents/hour he makes stamping license plates!

As tax professionals ourselves, we're appalled at how Steven Martinez betrayed his clients. We're proud to affirm our commitment to helping you save tax within the bounds of the law — because we know just how many legitimate opportunities there are to save. We're pleased to offer you the plan that helps you save taxes and sleep soundly at night. So call us for that plan!

Click here to schedule an with Kenneth Hoffman.

Kenneth Hoffman of K.R. Hoffman & Co., LLC is a highly sought after tax and business counselor. Counseling Entrepreneurs, Professionals and Select Individuals who are struggling with ever changing tax laws and who are paying too much in taxes. All the while he is protecting his clients from the IRS and other taxing authorities using proactive tax planning strategies, ensuring compliance with minimal tax liability while bringing his clients Peace or Mind.

Discover how I can help you overcome your tax and business challenges. To start the conversation or to become a client, call Kenneth Hoffman at (954) 591-8290 Monday - Friday between 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. for a no cost consultation, or drop me a note.

Click here to schedule an with Kenneth Hoffman.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

October 14, 2013

2013 Year End Tax Planning

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

Year-end tax planning could be especially productive this year because timely action could nail down a host of tax breaks that won't be around next year unless Congress acts to extend them, which, at the present time, looks doubtful. These include, for individuals: the option to deduct state and local sales and use taxes instead of state and local income taxes; the above-the-line deduction for qualified higher education expenses; and tax-free distributions by those age 70-— or older from IRAs for charitable purposes. For businesses, tax breaks that are available through the end of this year but won't be around next year unless Congress acts include: 50% bonus first-year depreciation for most new machinery, equipment and software; an extraordinarily high $500,000 expensing limitation; the research tax credit; and the 15-year write-off for qualified leasehold improvements, qualified restaurant buildings and improvements and qualified retail improvements.

High-income-earners have other factors to keep in mind when mapping out year-end plans. For the first time, they have to take into account the 3.8% tax surtax on unearned income and the additional 0.9% Medicare (hospital insurance, or HI) tax that applies to individuals receiving wages with respect to employment in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly and $125,000 for married couples filing separately).

The surtax is 3.8% of the lesser of: (1) net investment income (NII), or (2) the excess of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) over an unindexed threshold amount ($250,000 for joint filers or surviving spouses, $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case). As year-end nears, a taxpayer's approach to minimizing or eliminating the 3.8% surtax will depend on his estimated MAGI and NII for the year. Some taxpayers should consider ways to minimize (e.g., through deferral) additional NII for the balance of the year, others should try to see if they can reduce MAGI other than unearned income, and others should consider ways to minimize both NII and other types of MAGI.

The additional Medicare tax may require year-end actions. Employers must withhold the additional Medicare tax from wages in excess of $200,000 regardless of filing status or other income. Self-employed persons must take it into account in figuring estimate tax. There could be situations where an employee may need to have more withheld toward year end to cover the tax. For example, consider an individual who earns $200,000 from one employer during the first half of the year and a like amount from another employer during the balance of the year. He would owe the additional Medicare tax, but there would be no withholding by either employer for the additional Medicare tax since wages from each employer don't exceed $200,000. Also, in determining whether they may need to make adjustments to avoid a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax, individuals also should be mindful that the additional Medicare tax may be overwithheld. This could occur, for example, where only one of two married spouses works and reaches the threshold for the employer to withhold, but the couple's income won't be high enough to actually cause the tax to be owed

We have compiled a checklist of additional actions based on current tax rules that may help you save tax dollars if you act before year-end. Not all actions will apply in your particular situation, but you will likely benefit from many of them. We can narrow down the specific actions that you can take once we meet with you to tailor a particular plan. In the meantime, please review the following list and contact us at your earliest convenience so that we can advise you on which tax-saving moves to make:

Year-End Tax Planning Moves for Individuals

Increase the amount you set aside for next year in your employer's health flexible spending account (FSA) if you set aside too little for this year.
If you become eligible to make health savings account (HSA) contributions in December of this year, you can make a full year's worth of deductible HSA contributions for 2013.
Realize losses on stock while substantially preserving your investment position. There are several ways this can be done. For example, you can sell the original holding, then buy back the same securities at least 31 days later. It may be advisable for us to meet to discuss year-end trades you should consider making.
Postpone income until 2014 and accelerate deductions into 2013 to lower your 2013 tax bill. This strategy may enable you to claim larger deductions, credits, and other tax breaks for 2013 that are phased out over varying levels of adjusted gross income (AGI). These include child tax credits, higher education tax credits, the above-the-line deduction for higher-education expenses, and deductions for student loan interest. Postponing income also is desirable for those taxpayers who anticipate being in a lower tax bracket next year due to changed financial circumstances. Note, however, that in some cases, it may pay to actually accelerate income into 2013. For example, this may be the case where a person's marginal tax rate is much lower this year than it will be next year or where lower income in 2014 will result in a higher tax credit for an individual who plans to purchase health insurance on a health exchange and is eligible for a premium assistance credit.
If you believe a Roth IRA is better than a traditional IRA, and want to remain in the market for the long term, consider converting traditional-IRA money invested in beaten-down stocks (or mutual funds) into a Roth IRA if eligible to do so. Keep in mind, however, that such a conversion will increase your adjusted gross income for 2013.
If you converted assets in a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA earlier in the year, the assets in the Roth IRA account may have declined in value, and if you leave things as-is, you will wind up paying a higher tax than is necessary. You can back out of the transaction by recharacterizing the rollover or conversion, that is, by transferring the converted amount (plus earnings, or minus losses) from the Roth IRA back to a traditional IRA via a trustee-to-trustee transfer. You can later reconvert to a Roth IRA.
It may be advantageous to try to arrange with your employer to defer a bonus that may be coming your way until 2014.
Consider using a credit card to prepay expenses that can generate deductions for this year.
If you expect to owe state and local income taxes when you file your return next year, consider asking your employer to increase withholding of state and local taxes (or pay estimated tax payments of state and local taxes) before year-end to pull the deduction of those taxes into 2013 if doing so won't create an alternative minimum tax (AMT) problem.
Take an eligible rollover distribution from a qualified retirement plan before the end of 2013 if you are facing a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax and the increased withholding option is unavailable or won't sufficiently address the problem. Income tax will be withheld from the distribution and will be applied toward the taxes owed for 2013. You can then timely roll over the gross amount of the distribution, as increased by the amount of withheld tax, to a traditional IRA. No part of the distribution will be includible in income for 2013, but the withheld tax will be applied pro rata over the full 2013 tax year to reduce previous underpayments of estimated tax.
Estimate the effect of any year-end planning moves on the alternative minimum tax (AMT) for 2013, keeping in mind that many tax breaks allowed for purposes of calculating regular taxes are disallowed for AMT purposes. These include the deduction for state property taxes on your residence, state income taxes (or state sales tax if you elect this deduction option), miscellaneous itemized deductions, and personal exemption deductions. Other deductions, such as for medical expenses, are calculated in a more restrictive way for AMT purposes than for regular tax purposes in the case of a taxpayer who is over age 65 or whose spouse is over age 65 as of the close of the tax year. As a result, in some cases, deductions should not be accelerated.
Accelerate big ticket purchases into 2013 in order to assure a deduction for sales taxes on the purchases if you will elect to claim a state and local general sales tax deduction instead of a state and local income tax deduction. Unless Congress acts, this election won't be available after 2013.
You may be able to save taxes this year and next by applying a bunching strategy to miscellaneous itemized deductions, medical expenses and other itemized deductions.
If you are a homeowner, make energy saving improvements to the residence, such as putting in extra insulation or installing energy saving windows, or an energy efficient heater or air conditioner. You may qualify for a tax credit if the assets are installed in your home before 2014.
Unless Congress extends it, the up-to-$4,000 above-the-line deduction for qualified higher education expenses will not be available after 2013. Thus, consider prepaying eligible expenses if doing so will increase your deduction for qualified higher education expenses. Generally, the deduction is allowed for qualified education expenses paid in 2013 in connection with enrollment at an institution of higher education during 2013 or for an academic period beginning in 2013 or in the first 3 months of 2014.
You may want to pay contested taxes to be able to deduct them this year while continuing to contest them next year.
You may want to settle an insurance or damage claim in order to maximize your casualty loss deduction this year.
Purchase qualified small business stock (QSBS) before the end of this year. There is no tax on gain from the sale of such stock if it is (1) purchased after September 27, 2010 and before January 1, 2014, and (2) held for more than five years. In addition, such sales won't cause AMT preference problems. To qualify for these breaks, the stock must be issued by a regular (C) corporation with total gross assets of $50 million or less, and a number of other technical requirements must be met. Our office can fill you in on the details.
If you are age 70-1/2 or older, own IRAs and are thinking of making a charitable gift, consider arranging for the gift to be made directly by the IRA trustee. Such a transfer, if made before year-end, can achieve important tax savings.
Take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from your IRA or 401(k) plan (or other employer-sponsored retired plan) if you have reached age 70-1/2. Failure to take a required withdrawal can result in a penalty of 50% of the amount of the RMD not withdrawn. If you turned age 70-1/2 in 2013, you can delay the first required distribution to 2013, but if you do, you will have to take a double distribution in 2014 the amount required for 2013 plus the amount required for 2014. Think twice before delaying 2013 distributions to 2014 bunching income into 2014 might push you into a higher tax bracket or have a detrimental impact on various income tax deductions that are reduced at higher income levels. However, it could be beneficial to take both distributions in 2014 if you will be in a substantially lower bracket that year, for example, because you plan to retire late this year.
Make gifts sheltered by the annual gift tax exclusion before the end of the year and thereby save gift and estate taxes. You can give $14,000 in 2013 to each of an unlimited number of individuals but you can't carry over unused exclusions from one year to the next. The transfers also may save family income taxes where income-earning property is given to family members in lower income tax brackets who are not subject to the kiddie tax.

Year-End Tax-Planning Moves for Businesses & Business Owners

Businesses should consider making expenditures that qualify for the business property expensing option. For tax years beginning in 2013, the expensing limit is $500,000 and the investment ceiling limit is $2,000,000. And a limited amount of expensing may be claimed for qualified real property. However, unless Congress changes the rules, for tax years beginning in 2014, the dollar limit will drop to $25,000, the beginning-of-phaseout amount will drop to $200,000, and expensing won't be available for qualified real property. The generous dollar ceilings that apply this year mean that many small and medium sized businesses that make timely purchases will be able to currently deduct most if not all their outlays for machinery and equipment. What's more, the expensing deduction is not prorated for the time that the asset is in service during the year. This opens up significant year-end planning opportunities.
Businesses also should consider making expenditures that qualify for 50% bonus first year depreciation if bought and placed in service this year. This bonus writeoff generally won't be available next year unless Congress acts to extend it. Thus, enterprises planning to purchase new depreciable property this year or the next should try to accelerate their buying plans, if doing so makes sound business sense.
Nail down a work opportunity tax credit (WOTC) by hiring qualifying workers (such as certain veterans) before the end of 2013. Under current law, the WOTC won't be available for workers hired after this year.
Make qualified research expenses before the end of 2013 to claim a research credit, which won't be available for post-2013 expenditures unless Congress extends the credit.
If you are self-employed and haven't done so yet, set up a self-employed retirement plan.
Depending on your particular situation, you may also want to consider deferring a debt-cancellation event until 2014, and disposing of a passive activity to allow you to deduct suspended losses.
If you own an interest in a partnership or S corporation you may need to increase your basis in the entity so you can deduct a loss from it for this year.

These are just some of the year-end steps that can be taken to save taxes. Again, by contacting us, we can tailor a particular plan that will work best for you.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

October 9, 2013

Try Looking in the Couch Cushions

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

People lose things all the time. Usually it's no big deal. We misplace our phone, keys, or sunglasses — then they show up an hour or a day later, or we replace them. Sometimes it's more serious. We lose money in a stock or a mutual fund — then we make it back over time. But every so often, someone loses big. We just hope it's not our public officials doing the losing!

Last month, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration ("TIGTA"), an IRS watchdog, released areport titled "Affordable Care Act: Tracking of Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund Costs Could Be Improved." That report reveals the the IRS can't account for $67 million set aside to administer the law better known as Obamacare. Now, we're not here to take sides in the ongoing debate over the new law. But we think even those who oppose the law would agree that the agency responsible for administering all the new taxes under that law should be able to track what it spends to do that job!

One of Obamacare's lesser-known provisions established the Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund ("HIRIF") to pay administrative expenses to carry out the law. From 2010 through 2012, the IRS spent $488 million from the fund to implement the Affordable Care Act, hiring 1,272 full-time equivalent employees. TIGTA audited that spending "to determine whether the IRS has an adequate process to accurately account for and report selected ACA implementation costs charged to the HIRIF." And what did they find?

Some costs were inaccurate or not tracked, and supporting documentation wasn't always kept. "Specifically, the IRS did not account for or attempt to quantify approximately $67 million of indirect ACA costs incurred for FYs 2010 through 2012."
Charges to the HIRIF were sometimes inaccurate and "not always substantiated by reliable supporting documentation."
Finally, the IRS didn't even bother tracking indirect costs, like rent, communications, and information technology support for employees involved in implementing the new law. "For example, while the IRS may have been able to place most new employees hired for the ACA in existing leased space, it still had to pay rent on this space, could not use the space for other purposes, and could not consider the space for inclusion in its ongoing space reduction efforts."

TIGTA made several specific recommendations. Mind-blowing ideas, too, like cross-checking travel records against employee hours to make sure the travel is related to the purpose of the fund, keeping better records to substantiate direct labor costs, and including indirect expenses in the total cost. The IRS didn't really have much of a defense, so they agreed with all of those recommendations. Unfortunately, the HIRIF money is all gone, so that promise doesn't mean much!

If you're fortunate enough to have $67 million in the first place, you're going to want help keeping it. That's where we come in. We give you the plan you need so you don't lose anything to unnecessary taxes. But time is running out to get that plan before the end of the year — and if you wait too long, you'll be losing money just like the IRS! So call us, now.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

October 2, 2013

IRS Announces No Refunds

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Tips

The IRS announced on its website on Tuesday that, “Tax refunds will not be issued until normal government operations resume.” This marked a change from its shutdown contingency plan, under which 859 employees in its Information Technology Services Enterprise Operations were excepted from the general shutdown furlough to ensure “refunds continue to process” and which said that "Without this support, . . . refunds to America's taxpayers would not occur.”

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

October 2, 2013

Horsing Around With Tax Preparers

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Preparation

This is a big week for taxes and technology. State "insurance exchanges" are scheduled to open for business under the Affordable Care Act, which lets consumers sign up for tax-subsidized individual health insurance. The White House has already announced that technological glitches will delay online enrollment on the small business ("SHOP") and Spanish-language sites. That's a decidedly 21st-century, "first world" problem. So, why on earth is the IRS lassoing an 1884 law dealing with lost Civil War horses to regulate tax preparers?

Right now, there are no industry-wide rules governing tax preparers. So, back in 2011, the IRS announced their new "Return Preparer Initiative," which required preparers to register with the IRS, pass a competency test, and take continuing education classes. The new rules apply to any tax preparer who isn't already regulated as an attorney, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), or Enrolled Agent (EA).

In 2012, a group of preparers sued to stop the program, arguing that the IRS lacked congressional authority to enforce it. Earlier this year, Judge James Boasberg agreed, shutting down the program. Naturally, the IRS appealed. And that brings us to our horses.

After the Civil War, thousands of Americans who had lost horses in the conflict brought war loss claims against the government. A whole stable full of agents emerged to press claims for the victims, usually for a piece of the recovery. Would you be shocked to learn that some of those claims were bogus, with greedy agents representing broken-down old nags as "Sea Biscuit"-class steeds? So the government passed the "Enabling Act of 1884" — also referred to as "the Horse Act of 1884" — to grant the Treasury Department permission to regulate them. (You remember all of this from high-school history, right? OK, neither did we.)

Well, last week, the IRS took their appeal to court, and saddled their argument on the Horse Law. Gil Rothenberg, who argued the government's case, said "I hate to beat a dead horse, especially one from the Civil War." But he argued that tax preparers represent clients just like 19th-century "enrolled agents" represented theirs. Therefore, he says, the 1884 law gives the Treasury the same authority to regulate today's tax preparers.

"Hold your horses," say the tax preparers who filed the case! Today's tax preparers merely provide a service to their clients. They don't actually "represent" them before the government the same way attorneys, CPAs, and EAs all do. That makes the 19th-century law a horse of a different color, with no binding authority to today's case.

Tax experts who observed the oral arguments report the judges sounded skeptical of the IRS's argument. We should know sometime early next year what the final decision will be. Of course, if Congress doesn't like the results, they can simply saddle up new legislation to hobble the Court.

We think the real question isn't who regulates your tax professionals. We think the real question is what sort of attitude a tax professional brings to the table. Are they content to put the right numbers in the right boxes on the right forms, then call it a day? Or do they give you the plan you need to create the savings you really want? So call us for that plan. And remember, we're here for your whole herd!

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

September 25, 2013

A Sweeter Tax Than Most

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Counsel, Tax Planning

When you hear the word "tax," you probably think of something the IRS takes out of your paycheck. Or you might think of something they take out of an inheritance. But taxes affect virtually every financial transaction you make. Take, for example, that simple jar of honey lurking on the shelf in your refrigerator.

Americans eat more honey than anyone else in the world — about 400 million pounds of it a year. Most of it goes towards sweetening foods like cereals, cookies, and breads. Even whiskey producers are adding honey to their blends to attract younger drinkers. (The Scotch Whiskey Association just stung Dewars for labeling their new "Highlander Honey" as "scotch" rather than "spirit drink.")

Where does all that honey come from? Well, China is the world's largest honey exporter. But Chinese beekeepers sometimes use pesticides banned here in the U.S. They sometimes dry their honey by machine, which lets the bees produce more, but leaves the honey with a foul taste similar to sauerkraut. Worst of all, Chinese producers sell their honey at prices as low as half of what our domestic producers charge.

Back in 2001, the U.S. government slapped Chinese honey with punitive tariffs, currently set at $2.63/kilogram, to protect American producers. Those taxes can triple the cost of Chinese honey. So today, about 40% of our honey comes from here in the U.S., with the rest coming from Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and other countries.

What's a poor Chinese beekeeper to do? Enter the "honey launderers." Chinese producers send their honey to nearby countries like Malaysia, Vietnam, India, or Korea, and re-label it as coming from those countries. They add rice sugar, molasses, or fructose syrup to hide any unpleasant tastes or smells. (Ick.) They filter the honey to remove the pollen, which palynologists, or pollen specialists, can use like a natural "fingerprint" to track down a honey's origin. And they pocket the savings they create by evading the tax.

How much tax does the illicit honey avoid? A lot. Back in 2008, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials charged 14 people with a globe-trotting scheme to evade $80 million in payments. And in February of this year, officials busted two of the nation's biggest suppliers for evading $180 million more. In a scene reminiscent of Donnie Brasco, officials launched "Operation Honeygate" and planted an agent "on the inside" for a year. The agent served as one supplier's director of procurement, and the investigation led to five individual guilty pleas, two deferred prosecutions, and $3 million in fines.

What's the lesson? Taxes are baked into the price of everything you buy, whether they're even paid or not!

There's not much we can do to help you avoid hidden tariffs on baked goods. Fortunately, we can help with the taxes that really count — taxes on your income, your payroll, and even your estate. If you're busy as a bee, you deserve to keep everything the law allows. So call us for the plan you need — and remember, we're here for everyone else in your hive!

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a comment and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

September 18, 2013

When the IRS Comes a-Knockin'

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Tips

If you get an IRS audit notice, you probably expect to spend hours responding to endless document requests, visiting bland government offices, and meeting with faceless bureaucrats. You might hope you get lucky and find yourself assigned to a pleasant, friendly examiner, one who acknowledges how intrusive and annoying the audit process can be. But you certainly wouldn't expect to wind up in bed with the auditor!

Vincent Burroughs is a 40ish contractor and amateur motorcycle racer in Fall Creek, Oregon. When the economy collapsed in 2008, his business suffered and he got behind on his taxes. In 2011, the IRS came calling. The auditor, Dora Abrahamson, recognized him from his motorcycle racing, and apparently liked what she saw. Burroughs claims Abrahamson started flirting with him over the telephone and by text message ("[I] need a hug badly, do you have one?"), offered him massages, and even sent him a "selfie" in a revealing pose!

Burroughs figured he had a friend at the IRS, so he didn't stop the flirting. In September 2011, Abrahamson visited him at his house to give him a hand with his papers. She showed up "provocatively attired," he says. She told him she could impose no penalty, or a 40 percent penalty. And she said if he would give her what she wanted, she would give him what he needed. After an awkward series of events that we don't need to detail here, the two wound up in bed. Shortly thereafter, Abrahamson stepped down from the case due to a conflict of interest, and the new auditor told Burroughs he owed $69,000.

Abrahamson's conduct caused Burroughs "to be agitated, depressed, and unable to sleep." It also made his girlfriend unhappy. (Uh oh.) So Burroughs sued Abrahamson and the IRS, seeking unspecified punitive damages. He claimed the IRS failed to properly supervise Abrahamson for, among other things, "permitting her carnal desires to overcome her judgment that it was inappropriate to pursue a sexual relationship with a taxpayer she was auditing," "failing to seek and follow through on getting help for her psychological problems," and "failing to sufficiently train Defendant Abrahamson on how to avoid situations which could lead to the appearance or actuality of sexual conduct with taxpayers being audited or investigated."

Unfortunately for Burroughs, the Federal Tort Claims Act waives immunity for government employees only when the injuries they cause take place within the scope of the employment. U.S. Magistrate Thomas Coffin ruled that Abrahamson's conduct did not occur substantially within the time and space limits authorized by her employment, was not motivated by a purpose to serve the employer, and was not of a kind that she was hired to perform. Therefore, it did not occur within the scope of her employment — so the IRS is off the hook! (News reports are less clear on whether Burroughs is off the hook with his girlfriend.)

The case has naturally attracted all sorts of press. Burroughs appeared on ABC's 20/20. And we thank Tonight Show host Jay Leno for making the obvious IRS joke so we don't have to!

What other lessons can we draw from this week's sad story? Well, if you do ever get an audit notice, call us before you try and handle it yourself! We'll make sure you get all the professional assistance you need to defend your financial interests and even your dignity.

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a commit and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

I truly value your business and I appreciate your referrals. Refer your family, friends, acquaintances, and business colleagues to KR Hoffman & Co., LLC.

September 4, 2013

When 20 Is Less Than 20.1 Million Dollars

by Kenneth Hoffman in Business Counsel, Tax Planning

Labor Day has come and gone, and, while fall isn't "officially" here, it's time to put away those summer whites. Never mind that the mercury is still hitting 100 degrees in parts of the country; forget about those pennant races still heating up in the AL West and NL Central. This weekend, the National Football League kicks off regular season play! This week's season opener is just the first step on the road to Super Bowl XLVII, to be played outdoors onFebruary 2, 2014, at the Meadowlands in New Jersey. (If you look hard enough on ESPN, you can find pre-game coverage starting early next week.)

Earlier this year, Baltimore quarterback Joe Flacco won MVP honors in Super Bowl XLVII and signed a new six-year contract worth $120.6 million. It makes him the highest-paid player in the game, just ahead of New Orleans quarterback Drew Brees. But in a surprise twist that NFL statisticians would love, Brees will actually take home more money than Flacco.

How can that be? Taxes, of course — why else would we be talking about it?

Here's how it all works. Flacco plays his home games at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, with his new contract paying him $20.1 million per year. According to Americans for Tax Reform, the IRS will intercept $8.72 million of that paycheck. Maryland and Baltimore County will pick off $1.72 million more, for a total combined tax bill of $10.44 million, or 51.98%. Flacco will also pay a "jock tax" for several of his away games — for example, when he plays the Cincinnati Bengals on November 10, he'll owe Cincinnati's 2.1% earnings tax on his pay for that game. And he'll pay even more tax on his bonuses, endorsements, and other income. It would be hard to blame Flacco for thinking the tax man roughs him up worse than any team's defensive line!

Now, Flacco could take home far more by playing for a team in one of the nine states that don't levy income taxes. The Jacksonville Jaguars (2-14 for 2012) would love a Super Bowl MVP at their helm. So would the 8-8 Dallas Cowboys. Neither Florida nor Texas tackle players with state or local income tax, which means Flacco would have taken home that $1.72 million sack.

Meanwhile, Drew Brees plays his home games at the New Orleans Superdome, with a contract paying him "only" $20 million per year. That's $100,000 less than Flacco makes in Baltimore. Brees pays the same 39.6% income tax and 3.8% Medicare tax as Flacco. But Louisiana's top tax rate is just 6% (on income over $50,000), compared to Maryland's 6.25% (on income over $1 million). That difference might not seem like a lot. But bring out the chains, and it means Brees actually keeps $470,000 more per year than Flacco.

As for the rest of us, this week doesn't just mark the start of football season. It also marks the start of tax-planning season! No NFL team would take the field without a game plan. So why would you think you can beat the IRS without a plan? If you don't have one, the clock is counting down toDecember 31, with no overtime. And remember, we're here for your teammates, too!

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a commit and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.

August 29, 2013

IRS To Treat Legally Married Same-Sex Couples As Married

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Planning, Tax Preparation, Tax Counsel

The Treasury Department and IRS announced today that legally married same-sex couples will be treated as married couples for federal tax purposes. This tax treatment will apply even if a couple lives in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage so long as they were married in a state that does.

The guidance, stemming from the Supreme Court ruling this summer that overturned the Defense of Marriage Act, says same-sex couples can begin filing tax returns as "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately" for the 2013 tax year.

"Today's ruling provides certainty and clear, coherent tax filing guidance for all legally married same-sex couples nationwide. It provides access to benefits, responsibilities and protections under federal tax law that all Americans deserve," Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said in a statement.

For more information... http://www.politico.com

August 28, 2013

Hit 'Em Where It Hurt

by Kenneth Hoffman in Tax Counsel, Tax Preparation

When people misbehave — badly enough — they go to jail. But when corporations misbehave, they can't go to jail. So they pay fines instead. Recent years have brought a wave of enforcement actions for various corporate offenses, from banks ripping off customers, to investment managers trading on inside information, to drug companies poisoning patients, to energy producers polluting public waters.

Corporations usually find a little bit of silver lining in those monster settlements. They get to deduct the payments on their taxes! You like that? You and I get to help pay the freight for their cheating!

Now, Section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code states that "no deduction shall be allowed . . . for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for the violation of any law." But defining a "fine or penalty" isn't as obvious as you might think (and it gives corporate tax lawyers the chance to bill a lot of hours arguing about it). Few of those settlements, especially in the Wall Street arena, require offenders to admit wrongdoing, and most include some form of restitution or disgorgement of profit. Those amounts aren't considered a fine or penalty, so they remain deductible.

What does that mean for our friends at the IRS? Well, when Exxon-Mobil paid $1.1 billion to settle claims over an oil spill in Alaska, it actually cost them just $524 million after tax. When Bank of America agreed to pay $335 million to settle charges that they had discriminated against black and hispanic borrowers, they got back up to $117 million of it in tax savings. Similarly, when credit card giant Capital One paid $210 million to resolve charges that they had duped customers into paying for credit monitoring and other add-on services, they saved millions in tax.

But now it looks like Uncle Sam is getting fed up with subsidizing the settlements by cutting off those juicy tax breaks. Now he's working to hit 'em where it really hurts!

Back in November, oil producer BP agreed to pay $4 billion to settle the Deepwater Horizon spill. Ordinarily, that might have meant a fat tax deduction to cushion the blow. But no such luck this time — the settlement included language explicitly defining the damages as "punitive," which prohibits BP from deducting any of that amount from their U.S. taxes.
Earlier this month, Swiss bank UBS paid $500 million to settle charges they manipulated the "LIBOR" interest-rate benchmark. Again, that settlement prevents UBS from deducting the penalty on their taxes.
Most recently, hedge fund manager Philip Falcone agreed to admit wrongdoing, accept a five-year ban from the securities industry, and pay an $18 million nondeductible penalty. Denying a tax deduction seems especially appropriate in Falcone's case, since federal regulators said his actions "read like the final exam in a graduate school course in how to operate a hedge fund unlawfully."

Tax policy questions like these can sometimes sound boring and pointless. But this one has real consequences. On the one hand, some experts argue that letting miscreants deduct settlements on their taxes encourages companies to settle out of court and avoids ongoing litigation. On the other hand, consumer advocates respond that tax-deductible settlements are a slap in the face to taxpayers, who wind up footing 35% of the tab. What doyou think? Do the tax deductions still serve a legitimate purpose? Or should Washington keep up the new hard line?

If you found this article helpful, I invite you to leave a commit and please share it on twitter, facebook or your favorite social media site and with your friends, family and colleagues. Thank you.